Foreign Direct Investment Disadvantages Essay Example for Free

inappropriate Direct Investment Disadvantages EssayThere is a lot to be said for big retail to make it to India, but we cannot simply be taken in and mimic roughthing which is existence pushed down our throats because those who micturate the policy appear to not have the faintest clue on how retail very works in India If there were clear answers in black and white to the question, there would really be no bring for any debate on the issue, but the truth is that it is simply not that simple. On a philosophical and emotional level, the answer could be that any form of foreign participation in a internal market is rife with dangers of the colonialism pick out, but in this day and age, while the core concept of being on the lookout of foreign dominance may still be true, the fact remains that there ar tummy of ways to ensure that it works on a win-win basis for all concerned. The main problem with the trustworthy status of foreign direct investment (FDI) in retail in I ndia is that it does not provide a level playing field to some other players of the domestic and small sort.In addition, it appears to take a kind of naive and simplistic view on certain aspects, which like myths being repeated, tend to become urban legends. On the other hand, no country can afford to take on an isolationist approach. To kick the bucket with, it may help to go through the background and policy note on the Cabinet decision on FDI in retail, as put up on various places on the internet. Facebook, PIB) As this source sees it, with a holistic view of the subject and not just based on jingoism of the throw a fit down the malls (right view) and bad for farmers (left view) sort, but on rational evaluation of large issues, there are some points which need to be straightened out. Large retail is inevitable, and that is a simple truth, but there has to be larger perspective for public good which seems to be missing from this policy. The people of India come first, inclu ding those who want a disclose product or service buying or selling experience, and at the end of the day it is their wallets which leave bottom decide where they go.But at the equivalent time, the government, with the policy as outlined above, cannot sell the baby with the bath-water, and betray things worse. Some suggestions 1) The present Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act requires urgent revamp if we really want to help the rural and agricultural sectors with a better go to market scenario. This, along with fast introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) as well as ease of inter- and intra-state movement of foodgrain, agri products and fresh produce, would do more to improve matters, as well as do wonders for our conomy in a variety of waysmost of all in terms of controlling prices as well as reducing entrepot and transit losses. 2) The policy shown above makes a illustration that brands by big FDI retailers need to be carried crossways borders withou t in any way making it clear that the quality of those brands needs to be same across borders, too. As of now we see that with these manufacturers and retailers there is one lower quality for sale in India and there is a better quality for sale in developed countriescase in point being soft drinks, processed foods, confectionery, electronics, motor vehicles and others.If anything is by way of a different quality for India for price or other reasons, then let it be clearly marked as such. 3) Specifically in the case of packaged and processed foods, the policy does not say anything about adherence to best case scenarios in terms of labelling of ingredients and avoiding misleading marketing ploys, thereby leading to a situation where outright dangerous products are foisted on Indian consumers. The amount of product detail available for consumers in developed countries must be matched for India, too.India cannot become a vast chemistry lab for processed foods or anything else. 4) More empirical info needs to be provided on subjects like improvement in supply chain. India is the country where the rider rail ticket deliveries, fresh hot cooked food by dabbawallas and diamonds as well as other precious stones by angadias have set better than global standards in supply chains, so the same standards need to be quantified and applied to those seeking 100% FDI in retail. It is not too much to expect for them to match the Indian standardsunless those who made the policy are ashamed of our prowess. ) The investments in retail by the FDI route, when they come, should come only through a short-list of recognised tax adherence countries. The misused option of FDI coming in through known or suspect tax havens needs to be blockedfirmly. Likewise, full disclosures of the strictest sort need to be made on who the investors areagain, these cannot be suitcase corporate identities hiding behind consultants and banks in shady tax havens or other countries. Unlike what happened in, for example, airlines, Indians need to know who is investing and from where.And in case there are legal issues, then we need to know who the faces are who will go through the Indian legal system, unless those who made the policy are ashamed of our legal system. 6) The payment affect and cash management as well as tax adherence part of this industry, both in terms of procurement and sale, need to be through the Indian banking system. And by fully transparent methods, so that float as well as control remains in India at all times, as is the case in developed countries.