'Is It Appropriate for Learning to Read? Essay\r'

'Dr. Carla Hannaford, an educator and neuroscientist, presented a revolutionary research that assistanted people guard a better understanding of the things they know and those that they do. Dr. Hannaford’s book entitled Smart Moves: Why instruction Is Not All In Your Head, has been praised for the insightful attach made between the corpse and learning. Joseph Clinton Pierce make up considered it as a research work that is greatly signifi crappert in understanding education and sister development.\r\nAside from that book, she also authored the book, The Dominance figure: How knowing Your Dominant Eye, Ear, Brain, Hand, & Foot Can modify Your Learning. In this book, she looked at the link between the carve up of a human’s body prospered for â€Å"seeing, hearing, touching, and moving” and a soul’s modality of mentation, working, ordering, playing, and interacting with new(prenominal)s (Hannaford, 1997). Basically, the research study con ducted by Dr. Hannaford scientifically enlarge and explained the connection of one’s mind and body movement and its implication in his/her learning and thinking abilities.\r\nIn the Dominance Factor book, Hannaford emphasized on the idea that combining one’s supreme eye, ear, hand, and human stem has tremendous effects in the port an individual learn. She also discussed the idea of an individual’s agency profile. This dominance profile, which can be notice in a simple and non-invasive muscle-testing, is a chance on element in molding a someone’s way of thinking, acting and communicating with others. tally to Hannaford, there are actually 32 polar combinations of a mortal’s â€Å" governing hemisphere, eye, ear, hand, and foot” (Hannaford, 1997).\r\nEach profile also helps a person identify what weaknesses they may encounter under stress. She plain asserts that understanding one’s profile forget help parents and even thei r children learn together in the best method suit adequate to(p) for them and that which give help the children perform at their highest capability (Hannaford, 1997). The concept presented by Dr. Hannaford could be tested and used in the different learning skills of people. Applying the dominance possibleness to an individual’s read abilities is interesting but poses both a positive and a negative manifestation.\r\nHannaford gave two major profile combinations that are easy to assess. She assumes that a person with a rife â€Å"logic hemisphere, eagerness eye, right ear, right hand, and right foot” understands better in a structured learning method and an dapper and chronological information presentation (Hughes & Vass, 2001). On the other hand, a person with a dominant â€Å"gestalt hemisphere, left eye, left ear, left hand, and left foot” learns faster through a perception of the bigger picture and understands the main idea yet has difficulty in looking at the details or the step-by-step procedures (Hughes & Vass, 2001).\r\nBeing aware of this assessment, parents who will be able to easily identify the dominant profiles of their children will find it easier to teach their children how to read and read healthy considering that they will be able to have the method that will be best relevant for their children. For the children, since their parents already know how they could read better, they will be able to find the learning process more(prenominal) enjoyable and to their advantage especially given that their parents utilize the technique where their child may respond well.\r\nHowever, utilizing the dominance theory also poses negative consequences. Parents who are able to identify the dominant profiles of their children, whether it is as easy as the left and right combinations or more Gordian like an overlapping combination of the two, will altogether give focus on that dominant profile. In doing so, they are dis regarding the development and enhancement of the other profiles of their children which is not that dominant but may well be applicable to their children. It somewhat constrains the parents to single-out the dominant profiles and set aside those which are not dominant at the moment.\r\nIn all these, it is observable that any theory poses both positive and negative consequences. Although the ideas presented regarding the dominant profiles and reading skills is interesting, the parents should still consider the holistic growth of their children wherein the teenaged ones develop all their skills as much as possible to their full potential and capabilities.\r\nReferences\r\nHannaford, C. (1997). The Dominance Factor: How Knowing Your Dominant Eye, Ear, Brain, Hand and Foot can improve your Learning. UT: Great River Books. Hughes, M. , & Vass, A. (2001). Strategies for conclusion the Lea\r\n'